Modeling the influence of dynamic zoning of forest harvesting on ecological succession in a northern hardwoods landscape.
Identifieur interne : 003F98 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003F97; suivant : 003F99Modeling the influence of dynamic zoning of forest harvesting on ecological succession in a northern hardwoods landscape.
Auteurs : Patrick A. Zollner [États-Unis] ; Eric J. Gustafson ; Hong S. He ; Volker C. Radeloff ; David J. MladenoffSource :
- Environmental management [ 0364-152X ] ; 2005.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- geographic : Wisconsin.
- classification : Trees.
- methods : Forestry.
- Animals, Birds, Computer Simulation, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecology, Models, Theoretical, Mustelidae, Time Factors.
Abstract
Dynamic zoning (systematic alteration in the spatial and temporal allocation of even-aged forest management practices) has been proposed as a means to change the spatial pattern of timber harvest across a landscape to maximize forest interior habitat while holding timber harvest levels constant. Simulation studies have established that dynamic zoning strategies produce larger tracts of interior, closed canopy forest, thus increasing the value of these landscapes for interior-dependent wildlife. We used the simulation model LANDIS to examine how the implementation of a dynamic zoning strategy would change trajectories of ecological succession in the Great Divide Ranger District of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest in northern Wisconsin over 500 years. The components of dynamic zoning strategies (number of zones in a scenario and the length of the hiatus between successive entries into zones) and their interaction had highly significant impacts on patterns of forest succession. Dynamic zoning scenarios with more zones and shorter hiatus lengths increased the average amount of the forest dominated by early successional aspen (Populus sp.). Dynamic zoning scenarios with two zones produced more late successional mature northern hardwoods than scenarios with four zones. Dynamic zoning scenarios with very short (30 years) or very long (120 years) hiatus lengths resulted in more late successional mature northern hardwoods than scenarios with intermediate hiatus lengths (60 and 90 years). However, none of the dynamic scenarios produced as much late successional mature northern hardwoods as the static alternative. Furthermore, the amounts of all habitat types in all dynamic zoning scenarios fluctuated greatly in time and space relative to static alternatives, which could negatively impact wildlife species that require a stable amount of habitat above some minimum critical threshold. Indeed, implementing dynamic zoning scenarios of different designs would have both positive and negative effects on wildlife species and for other objectives of forest management.
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-0217-9
PubMed: 15920674
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Modeling the influence of dynamic zoning of forest harvesting on ecological succession in a northern hardwoods landscape.</title><author><name sortKey="Zollner, Patrick A" sort="Zollner, Patrick A" uniqKey="Zollner P" first="Patrick A" last="Zollner">Patrick A. Zollner</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 5985, Highway K, Rhinelander, Wisconsin 54501, USA. pzollner@fs.fed.us</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 5985, Highway K, Rhinelander, Wisconsin 54501</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Wisconsin 54501</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gustafson, Eric J" sort="Gustafson, Eric J" uniqKey="Gustafson E" first="Eric J" last="Gustafson">Eric J. Gustafson</name></author><author><name sortKey="He, Hong S" sort="He, Hong S" uniqKey="He H" first="Hong S" last="He">Hong S. He</name></author><author><name sortKey="Radeloff, Volker C" sort="Radeloff, Volker C" uniqKey="Radeloff V" first="Volker C" last="Radeloff">Volker C. Radeloff</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mladenoff, David J" sort="Mladenoff, David J" uniqKey="Mladenoff D" first="David J" last="Mladenoff">David J. Mladenoff</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15920674</idno><idno type="pmid">15920674</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00267-003-0217-9</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">004050</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004050</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004050</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">004050</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004050</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Modeling the influence of dynamic zoning of forest harvesting on ecological succession in a northern hardwoods landscape.</title><author><name sortKey="Zollner, Patrick A" sort="Zollner, Patrick A" uniqKey="Zollner P" first="Patrick A" last="Zollner">Patrick A. Zollner</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 5985, Highway K, Rhinelander, Wisconsin 54501, USA. pzollner@fs.fed.us</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 5985, Highway K, Rhinelander, Wisconsin 54501</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Wisconsin 54501</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gustafson, Eric J" sort="Gustafson, Eric J" uniqKey="Gustafson E" first="Eric J" last="Gustafson">Eric J. Gustafson</name></author><author><name sortKey="He, Hong S" sort="He, Hong S" uniqKey="He H" first="Hong S" last="He">Hong S. He</name></author><author><name sortKey="Radeloff, Volker C" sort="Radeloff, Volker C" uniqKey="Radeloff V" first="Volker C" last="Radeloff">Volker C. Radeloff</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mladenoff, David J" sort="Mladenoff, David J" uniqKey="Mladenoff D" first="David J" last="Mladenoff">David J. Mladenoff</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Environmental management</title><idno type="ISSN">0364-152X</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals (MeSH)</term><term>Birds (MeSH)</term><term>Computer Simulation (MeSH)</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources (MeSH)</term><term>Ecology (MeSH)</term><term>Forestry (methods)</term><term>Models, Theoretical (MeSH)</term><term>Mustelidae (MeSH)</term><term>Time Factors (MeSH)</term><term>Trees (classification)</term><term>Wisconsin (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux (MeSH)</term><term>Arbres (classification)</term><term>Conservation des ressources naturelles (MeSH)</term><term>Facteurs temps (MeSH)</term><term>Modèles théoriques (MeSH)</term><term>Mustelidae (MeSH)</term><term>Oiseaux (MeSH)</term><term>Science forêt (méthodes)</term><term>Simulation numérique (MeSH)</term><term>Wisconsin (MeSH)</term><term>Écologie (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Wisconsin</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Forestry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Science forêt</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Birds</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Models, Theoretical</term><term>Mustelidae</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux</term><term>Arbres</term><term>Conservation des ressources naturelles</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Modèles théoriques</term><term>Mustelidae</term><term>Oiseaux</term><term>Simulation numérique</term><term>Wisconsin</term><term>Écologie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Dynamic zoning (systematic alteration in the spatial and temporal allocation of even-aged forest management practices) has been proposed as a means to change the spatial pattern of timber harvest across a landscape to maximize forest interior habitat while holding timber harvest levels constant. Simulation studies have established that dynamic zoning strategies produce larger tracts of interior, closed canopy forest, thus increasing the value of these landscapes for interior-dependent wildlife. We used the simulation model LANDIS to examine how the implementation of a dynamic zoning strategy would change trajectories of ecological succession in the Great Divide Ranger District of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest in northern Wisconsin over 500 years. The components of dynamic zoning strategies (number of zones in a scenario and the length of the hiatus between successive entries into zones) and their interaction had highly significant impacts on patterns of forest succession. Dynamic zoning scenarios with more zones and shorter hiatus lengths increased the average amount of the forest dominated by early successional aspen (Populus sp.). Dynamic zoning scenarios with two zones produced more late successional mature northern hardwoods than scenarios with four zones. Dynamic zoning scenarios with very short (30 years) or very long (120 years) hiatus lengths resulted in more late successional mature northern hardwoods than scenarios with intermediate hiatus lengths (60 and 90 years). However, none of the dynamic scenarios produced as much late successional mature northern hardwoods as the static alternative. Furthermore, the amounts of all habitat types in all dynamic zoning scenarios fluctuated greatly in time and space relative to static alternatives, which could negatively impact wildlife species that require a stable amount of habitat above some minimum critical threshold. Indeed, implementing dynamic zoning scenarios of different designs would have both positive and negative effects on wildlife species and for other objectives of forest management.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">15920674</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2005</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2005</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0364-152X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>35</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Environmental management</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Environ Manage</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Modeling the influence of dynamic zoning of forest harvesting on ecological succession in a northern hardwoods landscape.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>410-25</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Dynamic zoning (systematic alteration in the spatial and temporal allocation of even-aged forest management practices) has been proposed as a means to change the spatial pattern of timber harvest across a landscape to maximize forest interior habitat while holding timber harvest levels constant. Simulation studies have established that dynamic zoning strategies produce larger tracts of interior, closed canopy forest, thus increasing the value of these landscapes for interior-dependent wildlife. We used the simulation model LANDIS to examine how the implementation of a dynamic zoning strategy would change trajectories of ecological succession in the Great Divide Ranger District of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest in northern Wisconsin over 500 years. The components of dynamic zoning strategies (number of zones in a scenario and the length of the hiatus between successive entries into zones) and their interaction had highly significant impacts on patterns of forest succession. Dynamic zoning scenarios with more zones and shorter hiatus lengths increased the average amount of the forest dominated by early successional aspen (Populus sp.). Dynamic zoning scenarios with two zones produced more late successional mature northern hardwoods than scenarios with four zones. Dynamic zoning scenarios with very short (30 years) or very long (120 years) hiatus lengths resulted in more late successional mature northern hardwoods than scenarios with intermediate hiatus lengths (60 and 90 years). However, none of the dynamic scenarios produced as much late successional mature northern hardwoods as the static alternative. Furthermore, the amounts of all habitat types in all dynamic zoning scenarios fluctuated greatly in time and space relative to static alternatives, which could negatively impact wildlife species that require a stable amount of habitat above some minimum critical threshold. Indeed, implementing dynamic zoning scenarios of different designs would have both positive and negative effects on wildlife species and for other objectives of forest management.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zollner</LastName><ForeName>Patrick A</ForeName><Initials>PA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 5985, Highway K, Rhinelander, Wisconsin 54501, USA. pzollner@fs.fed.us</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gustafson</LastName><ForeName>Eric J</ForeName><Initials>EJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>He</LastName><ForeName>Hong S</ForeName><Initials>HS</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Radeloff</LastName><ForeName>Volker C</ForeName><Initials>VC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mladenoff</LastName><ForeName>David J</ForeName><Initials>DJ</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Environ Manage</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7703893</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0364-152X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001717" MajorTopicYN="N">Birds</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003198" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer Simulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="Y">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004463" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ecology</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016468" MajorTopicYN="N">Forestry</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008962" MajorTopicYN="Y">Models, Theoretical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D045969" MajorTopicYN="N">Mustelidae</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014922" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Wisconsin</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2005</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15920674</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00267-003-0217-9</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Gustafson, Eric J" sort="Gustafson, Eric J" uniqKey="Gustafson E" first="Eric J" last="Gustafson">Eric J. Gustafson</name><name sortKey="He, Hong S" sort="He, Hong S" uniqKey="He H" first="Hong S" last="He">Hong S. He</name><name sortKey="Mladenoff, David J" sort="Mladenoff, David J" uniqKey="Mladenoff D" first="David J" last="Mladenoff">David J. Mladenoff</name><name sortKey="Radeloff, Volker C" sort="Radeloff, Volker C" uniqKey="Radeloff V" first="Volker C" last="Radeloff">Volker C. Radeloff</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Zollner, Patrick A" sort="Zollner, Patrick A" uniqKey="Zollner P" first="Patrick A" last="Zollner">Patrick A. Zollner</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F98 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003F98 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15920674
|texte= Modeling the influence of dynamic zoning of forest harvesting on ecological succession in a northern hardwoods landscape.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15920674" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |